Adjust the variables. See the math. Understand the model.
You raised the right question on our last call: on the surface, spending $40K to generate $4,500 in revenue sounds like a broken model. You're right. If that's the whole story, it is. This page is the rest of the story. What it shows is not month-6 profitability. What it shows is cost per acquisition compressing over time, the signal that tells an investor the unit economics are working and the model is worth backing at scale.
Every number in this model counts one thing only: a pet owner who created an account, booked a slot, and physically showed up to the facility. Not a click. Not a form fill. Not a calendar hold. Showed up. That's the only metric that generates revenue, proves the model, and means anything to an investor.
To drive early adoption, Pet Passport offers a $25 credit per showed-up booking in months 2 through 4, capped at $1,000 total. This is absorbed by Pet Passport as a user acquisition cost. It is not charged to the facility and not visible to the pet owner as a fee. It exists to reduce friction for first-time users and prove the market will actually show up before we ask facilities to pay for leads.
The four sliders at the top control the key variables — lead fee, ad spend, no-show rate, and production budget. Move them and every number updates in real time. Proforma shows the month-by-month spend and CPA compression. The Case shows why the model holds up — LTV, the Google LSA benchmark, and the full production budget. Booking Ramp is the committed monthly target. Scale shows the path to a $5M–$10M valuation.
| Month | Ad Spend | Incentive | Total Out | Showed Up | Cumulative | Fac. Revenue | Net | CPA | Phase |
|---|
| Month | Target Showed-Up | Gross Needed | Cumulative | MoM Growth | Incentive Active | What Drives Bookings |
|---|
Month 1 is setup. The platform is unknown, the ad system is cold, and the content hasn't had time to compound. Months 2 and 3 introduce the $25 incentive and warm the audience. By month 4, you have a proven market signal, signed facilities, and an audience that trusts the product. The big numbers come after the system is loaded, not before it is tested.
Every showed-up appointment is a closed loop: account created, slot booked, pet owner physically arrived. That is not a click or a form fill. It is a delivered outcome. CPA compression from month 2 to month 6 demonstrates that the system gets more efficient as it scales, not less. That is the signal investors look for in a marketplace.
| Stage | Cities | Monthly Bookings | Annual Revenue | Valuation @ 5x | Valuation @ 8x | Notes |
|---|
| Phase | Lead Fee | Cities to $5M | Cities to $10M | vs. Google LSA Floor | Context |
|---|
Tier 1 (top 15 major metros: New York, LA, Chicago, Dallas, Houston, DC, Miami, Philadelphia, Atlanta, Phoenix, Boston, San Francisco, Seattle, San Diego, Denver) plus Tier 2 (Minneapolis, Tampa, Portland, Austin, Charlotte, Nashville, Sacramento, Orlando, Las Vegas, Denver, Columbus, Indianapolis, Raleigh, Salt Lake City, Baltimore) gets you to 30 established markets. At a $60 lead fee, that is your $10M. You never need to touch a secondary market.
Google LSA charges $50-$150 per phone call with no show-up guarantee and no booking data. By the time Pet Passport raises its rate to $50-$75, facilities have months of showed-up appointments on record, a full booking history, and zero no-show risk. The platform is still 50% cheaper than LSA and provably more reliable. There is no negotiating leverage on the facility side once the model is proven.